linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] kobject: introduce kobject_del_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97711a466efa4353bb924b30cc52d7fa@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Mar 2023 22:22:54 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Yangtao Li' <frank.li@...o.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] kobject: introduce kobject_del_and_put()

From: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
> Sent: 18 March 2023 20:17
> 
> There are plenty of using kobject_del() and kobject_put() together
> in the kernel tree. This patch wraps these two calls in a single helper.

But why?
You are adding an extra function call for no benefit.
At best, perhaps, a static inline function.

	David

...
> +void kobject_del_and_put(struct kobject *kobj)
> +{
> +	kobject_del(kobj);
> +	kobject_put(kobj);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kobject_del_and_put);
> +
>  static void dynamic_kobj_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>  {
>  	pr_debug("kobject: (%p): %s\n", kobj, __func__);
> @@ -874,8 +888,7 @@ void kset_unregister(struct kset *k)
>  {
>  	if (!k)
>  		return;
> -	kobject_del(&k->kobj);
> -	kobject_put(&k->kobj);
> +	kobject_del_and_put(&k->kobj);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kset_unregister);
> 
> --
> 2.35.1

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)