lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 06:16:13 +0000 From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com> To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: vmalloc: convert vread() to vread_iter() On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 02:50:56AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 12:20:12AM +0000, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: > > /* for /proc/kcore */ > > -extern long vread(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count); > > +extern long vread_iter(char *addr, size_t count, struct iov_iter *iter); > > I don't love the order of the arguments here. Usually we follow > memcpy() and have (dst, src, len). This sometimes gets a bit more > complex when either src or dst need two arguments, but that's not the > case here. Indeed it's not delightful, I did this purely to mimic the order of copy_to_iter() and friends which place iter last, however on second thoughts I think placing iter first would be better here where we have the freedom to order things more sensibly. I'll respin with a fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists