[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b5de584-b31f-9045-a438-b42da350326b@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:34:52 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>, cocci@...ia.fr,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: iforce - Fix exception handling in
iforce_usb_probe()
On 2023/03/20 13:21, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 07:03:00PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2023 18:50:51 +0100
>>
>> The label “fail” was used to jump to another pointer check despite of
>> the detail in the implementation of the function “iforce_usb_probe”
>> that it was determined already that a corresponding variable contained
>> still a null pointer.
>>
>> 1. Use more appropriate labels instead.
>>
>> 2. Reorder jump targets at the end.
>>
>> 3. Delete a redundant check.
>>
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> I am sorry, but I do not understand what the actual issue is. The fact
> that come Coccinelle script complains is not enough to change the code.
>
Right. There is no issue with the code, for usb_free_urb(NULL) is a no-op.
Proposing as a cleanup, without Fixes: tags, could be possible though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists