linux-kernel - Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression" for stable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <472c53aa-4803-cde9-8f80-cbd7d33dc9c5@leemhuis.info>
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 07:19:05 +0100
From:   "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" 
        <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal
 regression" for stable

Hi Greg. From https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217215 it
looks like you want to add be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host
directory removal regression") to your stable queue. It lacks a stable
tag, but fixes a bug in a commit that afaics was backported to all
stable series last week.

Side note: would you scripts have noticed this automatically and added
it to the queue today? (Just wondering if this mail actually makes any
difference.)

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.