linux-kernel - Re: Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression" for stable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 07:45:04 +0100
From:   "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" 
        <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Consider picking up "scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory
 removal regression" for stable

On 20.03.23 07:19, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> Hi Greg. From https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217215 it
> looks like you want to add be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host
> directory removal regression") to your stable queue. It lacks a stable
> tag, but fixes a bug in a commit that afaics was backported to all
> stable series last week.
> 
> Side note: would you scripts have noticed this automatically and added
> it to the queue today? (Just wondering if this mail actually makes any
> difference.)

Sorry, ignore that, I noticed that fix is already in your queue (I
looked at it before writing that mail, but it seems I somehow missed it
and only noticed now; sorry for the noise).

Ciao, Thorsten