[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bkknu1fe.fsf@esperi.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:06:45 +0000
From: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com>, mcgrof@...nel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] MODULE_LICENSE removals, fifth tranche
On 28 Feb 2023, Geert Uytterhoeven outgrape:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 2:05 PM Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@...cle.com> wrote:
>> This series, based on current modules-next, is part of a treewide cleanup
>> suggested by Luis Chamberlain, to remove the LICENSE_MODULE usage from
>> files/objects that are not tristate. Due to recent changes to kbuild, these
>> uses are now problematic. See the commit logs for more details.
>
> Does this mean you expect us to queue them for v6.3?
> Thanks!
I believe Luis is planning to pull them in around -rc3, hence my
freshening the series up now, getting everyone's tags in, etc.
--
NULL && (void)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists