[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBg/SCbVBAqNCU+F@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:11:04 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] mm/cma: move init_cma_reserved_pages() to cma.c
and make it static
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:30:20AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.03.23 22:59, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> >
> > init_cma_reserved_pages() only used in cma.c, no point of having it in
> > page_alloc.c.
> >
> > Move init_cma_reserved_pages() to cma.c and make it static.
>
> I guess the motivation is to avoid letting too many subsystems mess with
> pageblock migratetypes, managed pages, PG_reserved ...
Judging by the git log it just ended up in page_alloc.c because
set_pageblock_migratetype() was static back then ;)
> So it kind of makes sense to have these low-level details out of common CMA
> code, no?
I don't mind keeping it out of cma and folding this into "grand move"
patch.
> --
> Thanks,
>
> David / dhildenb
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists