[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8aa1db52-bc5b-a734-cf4f-ddee518ee9fb@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:14:30 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/15] mm/cma: move init_cma_reserved_pages() to cma.c and
make it static
On 20.03.23 12:11, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:30:20AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 19.03.23 22:59, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>>> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>>>
>>> init_cma_reserved_pages() only used in cma.c, no point of having it in
>>> page_alloc.c.
>>>
>>> Move init_cma_reserved_pages() to cma.c and make it static.
>>
>> I guess the motivation is to avoid letting too many subsystems mess with
>> pageblock migratetypes, managed pages, PG_reserved ...
>
> Judging by the git log it just ended up in page_alloc.c because
> set_pageblock_migratetype() was static back then ;)
Yeah, it leaked into page_isolation, which heavily relies on migratetype
handling :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists