[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87382b5e-f3f8-601c-77ff-ecd44d911042@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:18:58 +0100
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: irenic.rajneesh@...il.com, david.e.box@...el.com,
markgross@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] platform/x86/intel/pmt/telemetry: Add driver version
Hi,
On 3/17/23 14:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:57 AM David E. Box
> <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add a driver version number to make it easier to track changes in
>> backported kernels.
>
> Sorry, but NAK. As Greg KH said, we do not use this anymore (in Git
> era) — the SHA from the Git _is_ the version of the driver.
I agree with Andy per driver version numbers are really not useful.
Generally speaking the version number will get updated say once
per upstream kernel-release in a separate commit, but there is
no guarantee that commit will get cherry-picked together with
other cherry-picked fixes.
So for downstream kernels these version numbers really don't
have any meaning and as such are useless.
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists