linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 0/7] Implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:10:02 -0400
From:   Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Michał Mirosław <emmir@...gle.com>,
        Danylo Mocherniuk <mdanylo@...gle.com>,
        Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@...driver.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/7] Implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info
 about PTEs

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 02:41:53PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:30:00AM -0700, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 11:58 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu,  9 Mar 2023 18:57:11 +0500 Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The information related to pages if the page is file mapped, present and
> > > > swapped is required for the CRIU project [5][6]. The addition of the
> > > > required mask, any mask, excluded mask and return masks are also required
> > > > for the CRIU project [5].
> > >
> > > It's a ton of new code and what I'm not seeing in here (might have
> > > missed it?) is a clear statement of the value of this feature to our
> > > users.
> > >
> > > I see hints that CRIU would like it, but no description of how valuable
> > > this is to CRIU's users.
> > 
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > The current interface works for CRIU, and I can't say we have anything
> > critical with it right now.
> > 
> > On the other hand, the new interface has a number of significant improvements:
> > 
> > * it is more granular and allows us to track changed pages more
> >   effectively. The current interface can clear dirty bits for the entire
> >   process only. In addition, reading info about pages is a separate
> >   operation. It means we must freeze the process to read information
> >   about all its pages, reset dirty bits, only then we can start dumping
> >   pages. The information about pages becomes more and more outdated,
> >   while we are processing pages. The new interface solves both these
> >   downsides. First, it allows us to read pte bits and clear the
> >   soft-dirty bit atomically. It means that CRIU will not need to freeze
> >   processes to pre-dump their memory. Second, it clears soft-dirty bits
> >   for a specified region of memory. It means CRIU will have actual info
> >   about pages to the moment of dumping them.
> > 
> > * The new interface has to be much faster because basic page filtering
> >   is happening in the kernel. With the old interface, we have to read
> >   pagemap for each page.
> 
> There is still a caveat in using userfaultfd for tracking dirty pages in
> CRIU because we still don't support C/R of processes that use uffd. 

This reminded me whether the interface can also expose soft-dirty as a
ranged soft-dirty collector too to replace existing pagemap read()s?  Just
in case userfault cannot be used.  The code addition should be trivial IIUC.

Then maybe PAGE_IS_WRITTEN will be a name too generic, it can be two bits
PAGE_IS_UFFD_WP and PAGE_IS_SOFT_DIRTY, having PAGE_IS_UFFD_WP the inverted
meaning of current PAGE_IS_WRITTEN.

-- 
Peter Xu