[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBneeOYHKBZl8SGe@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:42:32 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/drop_caches: move drop_caches sysctls into its own
file
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:09:07PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> +static struct ctl_table drop_caches_table[] = {
> + {
> + .procname = "drop_caches",
> + .data = &sysctl_drop_caches,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> + .mode = 0200,
> + .proc_handler = drop_caches_sysctl_handler,
> + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> + .extra2 = SYSCTL_FOUR,
> + },
> + {}
> +};
Could we avoid doing this until we no longer need an entire zero entry
after the last one? Also, please post scripts/bloat-o-meter results
for before-and-after.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists