[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBnho5yPbXIQs752@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:56:03 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/drop_caches: move drop_caches sysctls into its own
file
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:42:32PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:09:07PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > +static struct ctl_table drop_caches_table[] = {
> > + {
> > + .procname = "drop_caches",
> > + .data = &sysctl_drop_caches,
> > + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> > + .mode = 0200,
> > + .proc_handler = drop_caches_sysctl_handler,
> > + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> > + .extra2 = SYSCTL_FOUR,
> > + },
> > + {}
> > +};
>
> Could we avoid doing this until we no longer need an entire zero entry
> after the last one?
That may be 2-3 kernel release from now. The way to use ARRAY_SIZE()
really is to deprecate the crap APIs that allow messy directory sysctl
structures.
> Also, please post scripts/bloat-o-meter results
> for before-and-after.
It should be one extry ~ ctl_table per move.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists