[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53675327-d708-d441-4cef-d493d0766911@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 05:17:08 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
To: Benjamin Bara <bbara93@...il.com>, lee@...nel.org
Cc: jonathanh@...dia.com, treding@...dia.com,
richard.leitner@...ux.dev, benjamin.bara@...data.com,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: tps6586x: use devm-based power off handler
On 3/21/23 01:03, Benjamin Bara wrote:
> +static int tps6586x_power_off_handler(struct sys_off_data *data)
> {
> - if (tps6586x_clr_bits(tps6586x_dev, TPS6586X_SUPPLYENE, EXITSLREQ_BIT))
> - return;
> + int ret;
Nit: "int ret" should be put after "struct tps6586x_dev" to adhere
canonical kernel coding style
> + struct device *tps6586x_dev = (struct device *)data->cb_data;
No need for casting of the void* type
--
Best regards,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists