[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230322105517.06e4508a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 10:55:17 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Alice Chen <alice_chen@...htek.com>,
ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds-lj tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:48:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the leds-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/leds/rgb/leds-mt6370-rgb.c: In function 'mt6370_check_vendor_info':
> drivers/leds/rgb/leds-mt6370-rgb.c:889:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'FIELD_GET' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 889 | vid = FIELD_GET(MT6370_VENDOR_ID_MASK, devinfo);
> | ^~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 55a8a5c16eb3 ("leds: rgb: mt6370: Add MediaTek MT6370 current sink type LED Indicator support")
>
> I have used the leds-lj tree from next-20230317 for today.
I am still getting this build failure.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists