[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMhs-H8_S5eO7B+dZ7jeq7Jjnw71QBmSo4M+woe3U5sH7dCADg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 05:34:18 +0100
From: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, john@...ozen.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device
tree binding documentation
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:15 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 20/03/2023 19:09, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> >>> Would mediatek,mtmips-clock.yaml make sense?
> >>
> >> More, except:
> >> 1. This is not clock, but sysc.
> >
> > Sergio, beware.
>
> I meant, that's what I understood from what Sergio said. :)
Yes, you understood properly. I will use 'sysc' instead.
>
> >
> >> 2. mips sounds redundant. Do you have rt2xxx and mt7xxx chips which are ARM?
> >
> > All of the SoCs, RTXXXX, MT7620, MT7621, MT7628, MT7688 are MIPS. So I
> > decided to call this platform MTMIPS as I've seen MediaTek use this on
> > other projects like U-Boot. This is what I did on my pinctrl patch
> > series as well.
>
> Ah, but indeed there are newer Mediatek MT6xxx and MT8xxx SoCs which are
> ARM, so mediatek,mtmips-sysc would work.
I can use 'mediatek,mtmips-sysc.yaml' as the name but compatibles will
start with ralink. There are already some existent compatibles for
mt762x already having ralink as prefix, so to be coherent ralink
should be maintained as prefix.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thanks,
Sergio Paracuellos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists