linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device tree binding documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <39ba681e-5bab-cffc-edf7-4bf86387987c@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 07:32:58 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc:     Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, john@...ozen.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device
 tree binding documentation

On 21/03/2023 05:34, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 7:15 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 20/03/2023 19:09, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>>> Would mediatek,mtmips-clock.yaml make sense?
>>>>
>>>> More, except:
>>>> 1. This is not clock, but sysc.
>>>
>>> Sergio, beware.
>>
>> I meant, that's what I understood from what Sergio said. :)
> 
> Yes, you understood properly. I will use 'sysc' instead.
> 
>>
>>>
>>>> 2. mips sounds redundant. Do you have rt2xxx and mt7xxx chips which are ARM?
>>>
>>> All of the SoCs, RTXXXX, MT7620, MT7621, MT7628, MT7688 are MIPS. So I
>>> decided to call this platform MTMIPS as I've seen MediaTek use this on
>>> other projects like U-Boot. This is what I did on my pinctrl patch
>>> series as well.
>>
>> Ah, but indeed there are newer Mediatek MT6xxx and MT8xxx SoCs which are
>> ARM, so mediatek,mtmips-sysc would work.
> 
> I can use 'mediatek,mtmips-sysc.yaml' as the name but compatibles will
> start with ralink. There are already some existent compatibles for
> mt762x already having ralink as prefix, so to be coherent ralink
> should be maintained as prefix.

The compatibles I mentioned start already with mediatek, so why do you
want to introduce incorrect vendor name for these?

Best regards,
Krzysztof