[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b3365947-5567-2fd7-1bb7-34052c40e5f6@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 07:34:14 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
john@...ozen.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device
tree binding documentation
On 20/03/2023 19:23, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 20.03.2023 21:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 20/03/2023 19:07, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> On 20.03.2023 21:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 20/03/2023 17:18, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>>>>> +properties:
>>>>> + compatible:
>>>>> + items:
>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>> + - ralink,rt2880-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,rt3050-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,rt3052-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,rt3352-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,rt3883-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,rt5350-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,mt7620-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,mt7620a-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,mt7628-sysc
>>>>> + - ralink,mt7688-sysc
>>>>
>>>> One more comment - this and maybe other compatibles - have wrong vendor
>>>> prefix. This is mediatek, not ralink.
>>>
>>> This platform was acquired from Ralink by MediaTek. I couldn't change
>>> some existing ralink compatible strings to mediatek as Rob explained on
>>> my pinctrl patch series that we don't do that. The compatible strings on
>>> this patch series here are new but I'd rather keep the compatible
>>> strings ralink to keep things consistent.
>>
>> The comment that you cannot change existing compatibles does not apply
>> to these, because these are new. However indeed some SoCs have already
>> compatibles with ralink, so it's fine for these. mt7620 and mt7628 are
>> already used with mediatek, so these should be rather corrected to new
>> prefix.
>
> If you're talking about the pinctrl schemas for MT7620 and MT7628, it's
> just the name of the yaml files that have mediatek. The compatible
> string is still ralink so it should be kept ralink here as well.
No, I am talking about compatibles.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists