[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230321054714.76287-2-rui.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:47:14 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] thermal/governors/step_wise: Adjust code logic to align with the comment
For the algorithm of choosing the next target state in step_wise
governor, the code does the right thing but is implemented in a
way different from what the comment describes. And this hurts the code
readability.
As the logic in the comment is simpler, adjust the code logic to align
with the comment.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
---
drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c | 20 ++++++--------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c
index 7a760b6a4279..318b38d04eb9 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_step_wise.c
@@ -53,24 +53,16 @@ static unsigned long get_target_state(struct thermal_instance *instance,
return next_target;
}
- switch (trend) {
- case THERMAL_TREND_RAISING:
- if (throttle) {
+ if (throttle) {
+ if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_RAISING)
next_target = clamp((cur_state + 1), instance->lower, instance->upper);
- }
- break;
- case THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING:
- if (cur_state <= instance->lower) {
- if (!throttle)
+ } else {
+ if (trend == THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING) {
+ if (cur_state <= instance->lower)
next_target = THERMAL_NO_TARGET;
- } else {
- if (!throttle) {
+ else
next_target = clamp((cur_state - 1), instance->lower, instance->upper);
- }
}
- break;
- default:
- break;
}
return next_target;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists