Message-ID: <ZBmLe27KrmXp7Qfc@boxer>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:48:27 +0100
From:   Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To:     Kal Conley <kal.conley@...tris.com>
CC:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] xsk: Support UMEM chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 08:56:54PM +0100, Kal Conley wrote:
> Add core AF_XDP support for chunk sizes larger than PAGE_SIZE. This
> enables sending/receiving jumbo ethernet frames up to the theoretical
> maxiumum of 64 KiB. For chunk sizes > PAGE_SIZE, the UMEM is required
> to consist of HugeTLB VMAs (and be hugepage aligned). Initially, only
> XDP_COPY mode is usuable pending future driver work.
> 
> For consistency, check for HugeTLB pages during UMEM registration. This
> implies that hugepages are required for XDP_COPY mode despite DMA not
> being used. This restriction is desirable since it ensures user software
> can take advantage of future driver support.
> 
> Even in HugeTLB mode, continue to do page accounting using order-0
> (4 KiB) pages. This minimizes the size of this change and reduces the
> risk of impacting driver code. Taking full advantage of hugepages for
> accounting should improve XDP performance in the general case.
> 
> No significant change in RX/TX performance was observed with this patch.
> A few data points are reproduced below:
> 
> Machine : Dell PowerEdge R940
> CPU     : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8168 CPU @ 2.70GHz
> NIC     : MT27700 Family [ConnectX-4]

can you tell us a bit more about your environment setup - from what i can
tell mlx4 does not support xdp multi-buffer, so you were testing this
feature with XDP program attached in generic mode?

if you were using xdpsock -S or xdpsock -c? or maybe even something
different?

what was your MTU size on NIC?

> 
> +-----+------------+-------------+---------------+
> |     | frame size | packet size | rxdrop (Mpps) |
> +-----+------------+-------------+---------------+
> | old |       4000 |         320 |          15.7 |
> | new |       4000 |         320 |          15.8 |
> +-----+------------+-------------+---------------+
> | old |       4096 |         320 |          16.4 |
> | new |       4096 |         320 |          16.3 |
> +-----+------------+-------------+---------------+
> | new |       9000 |         320 |           6.3 |
> | new |      10240 |        9000 |           0.4 |
> +-----+------------+-------------+---------------+
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kal Conley <kal.conley@...tris.com>
> ---
>  include/net/xdp_sock.h      |  1 +
>  include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h  |  6 +++++
>  include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h |  4 +++-
>  net/xdp/xdp_umem.c          | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  net/xdp/xsk.c               |  3 +++
>  net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c     | 16 +++++++++----
>  6 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock.h b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> index 3057e1a4a11c..e562ac3f5295 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock.h
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ struct xdp_umem {
>  	struct user_struct *user;
>  	refcount_t users;
>  	u8 flags;
> +	bool hugetlb;
>  	bool zc;
>  	struct page **pgs;
>  	int id;
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h b/include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h
> index 9c0d860609ba..eb630d17f994 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp_sock_drv.h
> @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@
>  #define XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SHIFT 11
>  #define XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE (1 << XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SHIFT)
>  
> +/* Allow chunk sizes up to the maximum size of an ethernet frame (64 KiB).
> + * Larger chunks are not guaranteed to fit in a single SKB.
> + */
> +#define XDP_UMEM_MAX_CHUNK_SHIFT 16
> +#define XDP_UMEM_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE (1 << XDP_UMEM_MAX_CHUNK_SHIFT)
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS
>  
>  void xsk_tx_completed(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, u32 nb_entries);
> diff --git a/include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h b/include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h
> index 3e952e569418..69e3970da092 100644
> --- a/include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h
> +++ b/include/net/xsk_buff_pool.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool {
>  	u8 cached_need_wakeup;
>  	bool uses_need_wakeup;
>  	bool dma_need_sync;
> +	bool hugetlb;
>  	bool unaligned;
>  	void *addrs;
>  	/* Mutual exclusion of the completion ring in the SKB mode. Two cases to protect:
> @@ -175,7 +176,8 @@ static inline void xp_dma_sync_for_device(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>  static inline bool xp_desc_crosses_non_contig_pg(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool,
>  						 u64 addr, u32 len)
>  {
> -	bool cross_pg = (addr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) + len > PAGE_SIZE;
> +	bool cross_pg = pool->hugetlb ? (addr & (HPAGE_SIZE - 1)) + len > HPAGE_SIZE :
> +					(addr & (PAGE_SIZE - 1)) + len > PAGE_SIZE;
>  
>  	if (likely(!cross_pg))
>  		return false;
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> index 02207e852d79..c96eefb9f5ae 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/hugetlb_inline.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/netdevice.h>
>  #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> @@ -19,6 +20,9 @@
>  #include "xdp_umem.h"
>  #include "xsk_queue.h"
>  
> +_Static_assert(XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE <= PAGE_SIZE);
> +_Static_assert(XDP_UMEM_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE <= HPAGE_SIZE);
> +
>  static DEFINE_IDA(umem_ida);
>  
>  static void xdp_umem_unpin_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem)
> @@ -91,7 +95,26 @@ void xdp_put_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem, bool defer_cleanup)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int xdp_umem_pin_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem, unsigned long address)
> +/* Returns true if the UMEM contains HugeTLB pages exclusively, false otherwise.
> + *
> + * The mmap_lock must be held by the caller.
> + */
> +static bool xdp_umem_is_hugetlb(struct xdp_umem *umem, unsigned long address)
> +{
> +	unsigned long end = address + umem->npgs * PAGE_SIZE;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	struct vma_iterator vmi;
> +
> +	vma_iter_init(&vmi, current->mm, address);
> +	for_each_vma_range(vmi, vma, end) {
> +		if (!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
> +			return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int xdp_umem_pin_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem, unsigned long address, bool hugetlb)
>  {
>  	unsigned int gup_flags = FOLL_WRITE;
>  	long npgs;
> @@ -102,8 +125,17 @@ static int xdp_umem_pin_pages(struct xdp_umem *umem, unsigned long address)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
> +
> +	umem->hugetlb = IS_ALIGNED(address, HPAGE_SIZE) && xdp_umem_is_hugetlb(umem, address);
> +	if (hugetlb && !umem->hugetlb) {
> +		mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out_pgs;
> +	}
> +
>  	npgs = pin_user_pages(address, umem->npgs,
>  			      gup_flags | FOLL_LONGTERM, &umem->pgs[0], NULL);
> +
>  	mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
>  
>  	if (npgs != umem->npgs) {
> @@ -152,20 +184,14 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>  {
>  	bool unaligned_chunks = mr->flags & XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG;
>  	u32 chunk_size = mr->chunk_size, headroom = mr->headroom;
> +	bool hugetlb = chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE;
>  	u64 addr = mr->addr, size = mr->len;
>  	u32 chunks_rem, npgs_rem;
>  	u64 chunks, npgs;
>  	int err;
>  
> -	if (chunk_size < XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE || chunk_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
> -		/* Strictly speaking we could support this, if:
> -		 * - huge pages, or*
> -		 * - using an IOMMU, or
> -		 * - making sure the memory area is consecutive
> -		 * but for now, we simply say "computer says no".
> -		 */
> +	if (chunk_size < XDP_UMEM_MIN_CHUNK_SIZE || chunk_size > XDP_UMEM_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
>  
>  	if (mr->flags & ~XDP_UMEM_UNALIGNED_CHUNK_FLAG)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -215,7 +241,7 @@ static int xdp_umem_reg(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_umem_reg *mr)
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	err = xdp_umem_pin_pages(umem, (unsigned long)addr);
> +	err = xdp_umem_pin_pages(umem, (unsigned long)addr, hugetlb);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out_account;
>  
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> index 2ac58b282b5e..3899a2d235bb 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> @@ -421,6 +421,9 @@ static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	sock_wfree(skb);
>  }
>  
> +/* Chunks must fit in the SKB `frags` array. */
> +_Static_assert(XDP_UMEM_MAX_CHUNK_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE <= MAX_SKB_FRAGS);
> +
>  static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(struct xdp_sock *xs,
>  					      struct xdp_desc *desc)
>  {
> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> index b2df1e0f8153..777e8a38a232 100644
> --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool *xp_create_and_assign_umem(struct xdp_sock *xs,
>  	pool->headroom = umem->headroom;
>  	pool->chunk_size = umem->chunk_size;
>  	pool->chunk_shift = ffs(umem->chunk_size) - 1;
> +	pool->hugetlb = umem->hugetlb;
>  	pool->unaligned = unaligned;
>  	pool->frame_len = umem->chunk_size - umem->headroom -
>  		XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;
> @@ -369,16 +370,23 @@ void xp_dma_unmap(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, unsigned long attrs)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xp_dma_unmap);
>  
> -static void xp_check_dma_contiguity(struct xsk_dma_map *dma_map)
> +/* HugeTLB pools consider contiguity at hugepage granularity only. Hence, all
> + * order-0 pages within a hugepage have the same contiguity value.
> + */
> +static void xp_check_dma_contiguity(struct xsk_dma_map *dma_map, bool hugetlb)
>  {
> +	u32 page_size = hugetlb ? HPAGE_SIZE : PAGE_SIZE;
> +	u32 n = page_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	u32 i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < dma_map->dma_pages_cnt - 1; i++) {
> -		if (dma_map->dma_pages[i] + PAGE_SIZE == dma_map->dma_pages[i + 1])
> +	for (i = 0; i + n < dma_map->dma_pages_cnt; i++) {
> +		if (dma_map->dma_pages[i] + page_size == dma_map->dma_pages[i + n])
>  			dma_map->dma_pages[i] |= XSK_NEXT_PG_CONTIG_MASK;
>  		else
>  			dma_map->dma_pages[i] &= ~XSK_NEXT_PG_CONTIG_MASK;
>  	}
> +	for (; i < dma_map->dma_pages_cnt; i++)
> +		dma_map->dma_pages[i] &= ~XSK_NEXT_PG_CONTIG_MASK;
>  }
>  
>  static int xp_init_dma_info(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct xsk_dma_map *dma_map)
> @@ -441,7 +449,7 @@ int xp_dma_map(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool, struct device *dev,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (pool->unaligned)
> -		xp_check_dma_contiguity(dma_map);
> +		xp_check_dma_contiguity(dma_map, pool->hugetlb);
>  
>  	err = xp_init_dma_info(pool, dma_map);
>  	if (err) {
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists