[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dce372bd-e63c-f24c-5b79-1ef65fd1e59a@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 11:07:29 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/irq: Add hardcoded hypervisor interrupts to
/proc/stat
On 2/27/23 10:46, Michael Kelley wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> index 766ffe3..9f668d2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -211,6 +211,13 @@ u64 arch_irq_stat_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_THRESHOLD
> sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_threshold_count;
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_HV_CALLBACK_VECTOR
> + sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_hv_callback_count;
> +#endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> + sum += irq_stats(cpu)->irq_hv_reenlightenment_count;
> + sum += irq_stats(cpu)->hyperv_stimer0_count;
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
> sum += per_cpu(mce_exception_count, cpu);
> sum += per_cpu(mce_poll_count, cpu);
This seems fine, especially since arch_show_interrupts() has them. But,
what's with the "#if IS_ENABLED" versus the plain #ifdef? Is there some
difference I'm missing? Why not just be consistent with the other code
and use a plain #ifdef for both?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists