[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28ee8ba9-fa42-d3bb-d3c4-44d7e77c64be@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 12:00:42 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, hare@...e.de, hch@...radead.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
Changhui Zhong <czhong@...hat.com>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] block: fix scan partition for exclusively open
device again
Hi,
在 2023/03/22 11:38, Ming Lei 写道:
>>>>>> Hi Yu kuai,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks the original issue starts to re-appear now with the two patches:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221130135344.2ul4cyfstfs3znxg@quack3/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And underlying disk partition and raid partition can be observed at the
>>>>>> same time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you take a look?
>>>>> Yes, thanks for the report. I realize that sda1 adn sdb1 is created
>>>>> while raid open sda and sdb excl, and I think this problem should exist
>>>>> before this patchset.
>>>>
>>>> Looks not reproduced before applying your two patches, that is
>>>> exactly what Jan
>>>> tried to fix with 36369f46e917 ("block: Do not reread partition
>>>> table on exclusively open device").
>>>
>>> Hi, Ming
>>>
>>> I just tried your test with this patchset reverted, and I can still
>>> reporduce the problem myself.
>>
>> Oops, I forgot to revert the first patch. It's right the problem can't
>> be reporduced.
>>>
>>> raid only open this device excl, and disk_scan_partitions is not called:
>>>
>>> md_import_device
>>> blkdev_get_by_devo
>>>
>>> I need to add some debuginfo to figure out how GD_NEED_PART_SCAN is set
>>> for sda after raid is stopped. And this should explain why sda1 is
>>> created.
>>
>> I found how GD_NEED_PART_SCAN is set now, in patch 2, this is set before
>> bd_prepare_to_claim, so preciously faild part scan will still set this
>> bit, and following patch shold fix this problem:
>
> Just run quick test, the issue won't be reproduced with your patch, and
> the change looks rational too,
>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
>
Thanks for the test and review, I just do some additional change to
clear GD_NEED_PART_SCAN, I will send a patch, can you take a look?
Kuai
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists