[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBpbGKxPQcs9NYst@ovpn-8-18.pek2.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 09:34:16 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, hare@...e.de, hch@...radead.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
Changhui Zhong <czhong@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] block: fix scan partition for exclusively open
device again
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:26:07AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 在 2023/03/21 19:43, Ming Lei 写道:
> > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:21:58AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> > >
> > > Changes from RFC:
> > > - remove the patch to factor out GD_NEED_PART_SCAN
> > >
> > > Yu Kuai (2):
> > > block: Revert "block: Do not reread partition table on exclusively
> > > open device"
> > > block: fix scan partition for exclusively open device again
> >
> > Hi Yu kuai,
> >
> > Looks the original issue starts to re-appear now with the two patches:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221130135344.2ul4cyfstfs3znxg@quack3/
> >
> > And underlying disk partition and raid partition can be observed at the
> > same time.
> >
> > Can you take a look?
> Yes, thanks for the report. I realize that sda1 adn sdb1 is created
> while raid open sda and sdb excl, and I think this problem should exist
> before this patchset.
Looks not reproduced before applying your two patches, that is exactly what Jan
tried to fix with 36369f46e917 ("block: Do not reread partition table on exclusively open device").
The issue is reported by Changhui's block regression test.
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists