[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5facd7c1-fa90-99ff-bd08-cdf67fe6c1ab@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 10:02:28 +0800
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>, Yu Kuai <yukuai1@...weicloud.com>
Cc: jack@...e.cz, hare@...e.de, hch@...radead.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com,
Changhui Zhong <czhong@...hat.com>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 0/2] block: fix scan partition for exclusively open
device again
Hi,
在 2023/03/22 9:34, Ming Lei 写道:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:26:07AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 在 2023/03/21 19:43, Ming Lei 写道:
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:21:58AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>>>>
>>>> Changes from RFC:
>>>> - remove the patch to factor out GD_NEED_PART_SCAN
>>>>
>>>> Yu Kuai (2):
>>>> block: Revert "block: Do not reread partition table on exclusively
>>>> open device"
>>>> block: fix scan partition for exclusively open device again
>>>
>>> Hi Yu kuai,
>>>
>>> Looks the original issue starts to re-appear now with the two patches:
>>>
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221130135344.2ul4cyfstfs3znxg@quack3/
>>>
>>> And underlying disk partition and raid partition can be observed at the
>>> same time.
>>>
>>> Can you take a look?
>> Yes, thanks for the report. I realize that sda1 adn sdb1 is created
>> while raid open sda and sdb excl, and I think this problem should exist
>> before this patchset.
>
> Looks not reproduced before applying your two patches, that is exactly what Jan
> tried to fix with 36369f46e917 ("block: Do not reread partition table on exclusively open device").
Hi, Ming
I just tried your test with this patchset reverted, and I can still
reporduce the problem myself.
raid only open this device excl, and disk_scan_partitions is not called:
md_import_device
blkdev_get_by_devo
I need to add some debuginfo to figure out how GD_NEED_PART_SCAN is set
for sda after raid is stopped. And this should explain why sda1 is
created.
Thanks,
Kuai
>
> The issue is reported by Changhui's block regression test.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists