lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2sfdwnoi8.fsf@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:16:48 +0800
From:   Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
To:     tglx@...utronix.de, longman@...hat.com, swboyd@...omium.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, wuchi.zero@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] debugobject: add unit test for static debug object


Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com> writes:

> Add test case to enusre that static debug object correctness.
>
> Tested on little-endian arm64 qemu, result:
>
> [    2.385735] KTAP version 1
> [    2.385860] 1..1
> [    2.386406]     KTAP version 1
> [    2.386658]     # Subtest: static debugobject init
> [    2.386726]     1..1
> [    2.401777]     ok 1 static_debugobject_test
> [    2.402455] ok 1 static debugobject init
>
> Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS                    |   5 ++
>  lib/Kconfig.debug              |  14 ++++
>  lib/Makefile                   |   2 +
>  lib/test_static_debug_object.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 lib/test_static_debug_object.c

Hi tglx:

What do you think about this test case? Should we need it ? There are
some platform compatibility issues here that need a little optimization.

-- 
BRs
Schspa Shi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ