[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2sfdwnoi8.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:16:48 +0800
From: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, longman@...hat.com, swboyd@...omium.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, wuchi.zero@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] debugobject: add unit test for static debug object
Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com> writes:
> Add test case to enusre that static debug object correctness.
>
> Tested on little-endian arm64 qemu, result:
>
> [ 2.385735] KTAP version 1
> [ 2.385860] 1..1
> [ 2.386406] KTAP version 1
> [ 2.386658] # Subtest: static debugobject init
> [ 2.386726] 1..1
> [ 2.401777] ok 1 static_debugobject_test
> [ 2.402455] ok 1 static debugobject init
>
> Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 5 ++
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 14 ++++
> lib/Makefile | 2 +
> lib/test_static_debug_object.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 lib/test_static_debug_object.c
Hi tglx:
What do you think about this test case? Should we need it ? There are
some platform compatibility issues here that need a little optimization.
--
BRs
Schspa Shi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists