linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] debugobject: add unit test for static debug object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87h6ub9a4w.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:53:19 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>, longman@...hat.com,
        swboyd@...omium.org, linux@...ck-us.net, wuchi.zero@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] debugobject: add unit test for static debug object

On Thu, Mar 23 2023 at 11:16, Schspa Shi wrote:
> Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com> writes:
>>  MAINTAINERS                    |   5 ++
>>  lib/Kconfig.debug              |  14 ++++
>>  lib/Makefile                   |   2 +
>>  lib/test_static_debug_object.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 lib/test_static_debug_object.c
>
> What do you think about this test case? Should we need it ? There are
> some platform compatibility issues here that need a little optimization.

What does it buy over the existing self test. Nothing AFACIT aside of
extra code.

Thanks,

        tglx