linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mce: Move storm handling to core.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB60835D7F85097FEF454DD74CFC879@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 18:10:31 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
CC:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com" 
        <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mce: Move storm handling to core.

> Can this patch and the previous two be squashed together?
>
> Like so?
>  Patch 1: Remove old code.
>  Patch 2: Add new common and Intel-specific code.
>  Patch 3: Add AMD-specific code.

Yazen,

Those three patches could be merged ... but they already seem big:

0002: 3 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
0003: 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
0004: 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)

Lumping them together wouldn't be the sum of those but would be worse (IMHO)

-Tony