[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083D33BC6860AB9FE2A292BFC879@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 20:26:02 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com"
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/mce: Move storm handling to core.
Yazen,
I folded the fixes for the issues you pointed to in patch 3/5 into the series and rebased to v6.3-rc3
Resulting tree pushed here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux.git try-storm-on6-3
Builds, boots, and passes my storm tests here.
How is testing going on the AMD side of this series?
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists