[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v8ir9rz6.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:40:13 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Begin reorganizing the arch documentation
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> writes:
> On 3/23/23 11:48, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> I could do the "fix up and send at the end of the merge window" trick
>> with it.
>
> That would work for me.
>
>> Or perhaps some of this should go via tip? Suggestions welcome.
>
> Since we have so many branches, we'll still have to do the merges
> between whatever branch carries the move and the actual doc-update branches.
>
> The end-of-the-merge-window is nice for us maintainers because we can
> ask the submitters to do any rebasing.
Now that I look...the only thing in linux-next currently that conflicts
is the shadow-stack series; if that continues, it might not be necessary
to do anything special.
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists