[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a5zuf4w7.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 12:52:40 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Begin reorganizing the arch documentation
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> writes:
> Now that I look...the only thing in linux-next currently that conflicts
> is the shadow-stack series; if that continues, it might not be necessary
> to do anything special.
There's an FPU patch now too. Git seems to handle the conflicts *almost*
seamlessly, though. So, FYI, I think I'll go ahead and drop this change
into docs-next, which will probably get us a cheery note from Stephen in
the near future.
(Stephen: the change is simply:
mv Documentation/x86 Documentation/arch/x86
the only fix I had to do in my test merge was to add the new
shadow-stack document in the new directory).
Thanks,
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists