linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 3/3] file, epoll: Implement do_replace() and eventpoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZB07etlmm6torSkz@ip-172-31-38-16.us-west-2.compute.internal>
Date:   Fri, 24 Mar 2023 05:56:10 +0000
From:   Alok Tiagi <aloktiagi@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
        David.Laight@...lab.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
        hch@...radead.org, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
        aloktiagi@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 3/3] file, epoll: Implement do_replace() and
 eventpoll_replace()

On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:24:26AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:15:26AM +0000, aloktiagi wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/eventpoll.h b/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> > index 3337745d81bd..38904fce3840 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/eventpoll.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ struct file *get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr(struct file *file, int tfd, unsigned long t
> >  /* Used to release the epoll bits inside the "struct file" */
> >  void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file);
> >  
> > +void eventpoll_replace_file(struct file *toreplace, struct file *file);
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * This is called from inside fs/file_table.c:__fput() to unlink files
> >   * from the eventpoll interface. We need to have this facility to cleanup
> > @@ -53,6 +55,22 @@ static inline void eventpoll_release(struct file *file)
> >  	eventpoll_release_file(file);
> >  }
> >  
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * This is called from fs/file.c:do_replace() to replace a linked file in the
> > + * epoll interface with a new file received from another process. This is useful
> > + * in cases where a process is trying to install a new file for an existing one
> > + * that is linked in the epoll interface
> > + */
> > +static inline void eventpoll_replace(struct file *toreplace, struct file *file)
> > +{
> > +	/*
> > +	 * toreplace is the file being replaced. Install the new file for the
> > +	 * existing one that is linked in the epoll interface
> > +	 */
> > +	eventpoll_replace_file(toreplace, file);
> > +}
> 
> Why do we have both eventpoll_replace() and eventpoll_replace_file()?
> They seem identical?

I was following the eventpoll_release_file() convention but yes seems
unnecessary. I'll retain eventpoll_replace_file() and remove
eventpoll_replace() in v4.

> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/file.h b/include/linux/file.h
> > index 39704eae83e2..80e56b2b44fb 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/file.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/file.h
> > @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct fd {
> >  	struct file *file;
> >  	unsigned int flags;
> >  };
> > +
> >  #define FDPUT_FPUT       1
> >  #define FDPUT_POS_UNLOCK 2
> >  
> 
> You should drop this hunk of the patch.

I overlooked this. Will fix it in v4.