[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZB08BPmuqEsw3bqU@ip-172-31-38-16.us-west-2.compute.internal>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 05:58:28 +0000
From: Alok Tiagi <aloktiagi@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
David.Laight@...lab.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
hch@...radead.org, Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.pizza>,
aloktiagi@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 2/3] file: allow callers to free the old file descriptor
after dup2
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:28:06AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:15:25AM +0000, aloktiagi wrote:
> > @@ -1119,8 +1119,12 @@ __releases(&files->file_lock)
> > __clear_close_on_exec(fd, fdt);
> > spin_unlock(&files->file_lock);
> >
> > - if (tofree)
> > - filp_close(tofree, files);
> > + if (fdfile) {
> > + *fdfile = tofree;
> > + } else {
> > + if (tofree)
> > + filp_close(tofree, files);
> > + }
>
> Why not:
>
> if (fdfile)
> *fdfile = tofree;
> else if (tofree)
> filp_close(tofree, files);
>
> Shorter and makes the parallel structure more obvious.
>
Agreed. Thank you for suggesting that. I'll fix this in v4.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists