linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: move DSI opp-table out of soc node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 26 Mar 2023 11:22:20 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm630: move DSI opp-table out of
 soc node

On 26/03/2023 11:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 at 12:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> The soc node is supposed to have only device nodes with MMIO addresses,
>> so move the DSI OPP out of it (it is used also by second DSI1 on
>> SDM660):
> 
> This raises a question: would it make sense to add /opps to handle all
> opp tables?

We didn't add it to any other cases like this (and we already fixed all
other boards), so why now? We can but it is a bit late for it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof