[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efa9a89e-ead7-8604-5d7a-07c728485eee@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 18:05:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
Cc: richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157
On 24/03/2023 17:03, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> christophe.kerello@...s.st.com wrote on Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:51:03 +0100:
>
>> To be able to compile the driver on all STM32MP SOCs, we move the
>> "depends on" on ARCH_STM32.
>>
>> Christophe Kerello (2):
>> memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>> MACH_STM32MP157
>> mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>> MACH_STM32MP157
>
> I don't see issue with taking these two patches in independent trees so
> if nobody disagrees I will take the second one through the mtd tree and
> let Krzysztof take the first one through mem-ctrl.
Sure, np.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists