linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 18:05:07 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
Cc:     richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of MACH_STM32MP157

On 24/03/2023 17:03, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
> 
> christophe.kerello@...s.st.com wrote on Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:51:03 +0100:
> 
>> To be able to compile the driver on all STM32MP SOCs, we move the
>> "depends on" on ARCH_STM32.
>>
>> Christophe Kerello (2):
>>   memory: stm32-fmc2-ebi: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>>     MACH_STM32MP157
>>   mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: depends on ARCH_STM32 instead of
>>     MACH_STM32MP157
> 
> I don't see issue with taking these two patches in independent trees so
> if nobody disagrees I will take the second one through the mtd tree and
> let Krzysztof take the first one through mem-ctrl.

Sure, np.

Best regards,
Krzysztof