lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:18:57 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>
Cc:     andersson@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
        agross@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, amit.pundir@...aro.org,
        regressions@...mhuis.info, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, robin.murphy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/11] Fix XPU violation during modem metadata
 authentication

Hi Sibi,

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:28:29PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> The memory region allocated using dma_alloc_attr with no kernel mapping
> attribute set would still be a part of the linear kernel map. Any access
> to this region by the application processor after assigning it to the
> remote Q6 will result in a XPU violation. Fix this by replacing the
> dynamically allocated memory region with a no-map carveout and unmap the
> modem metadata memory region before passing control to the remote Q6.
> The addition of the carveout and memunmap is required only on SoCs that
> mandate memory protection before transferring control to Q6, hence the
> driver falls back to dynamic memory allocation in the absence of the
> modem metadata carveout.

[...]

>   remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Use a carveout to authenticate modem
>     headers

With this change now merged, am I ok to downgrade the arm64
arch_dma_prep_coherent() back to a clean?

Thanks,

Will

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ