lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230403160852.GD11346@thinkpad> Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 21:38:52 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org> Cc: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, amit.pundir@...aro.org, regressions@...mhuis.info, sumit.semwal@...aro.org, catalin.marinas@....com, robin.murphy@....com Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/11] Fix XPU violation during modem metadata authentication On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 05:18:57PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Sibi, > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 02:28:29PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > > The memory region allocated using dma_alloc_attr with no kernel mapping > > attribute set would still be a part of the linear kernel map. Any access > > to this region by the application processor after assigning it to the > > remote Q6 will result in a XPU violation. Fix this by replacing the > > dynamically allocated memory region with a no-map carveout and unmap the > > modem metadata memory region before passing control to the remote Q6. > > The addition of the carveout and memunmap is required only on SoCs that > > mandate memory protection before transferring control to Q6, hence the > > driver falls back to dynamic memory allocation in the absence of the > > modem metadata carveout. > > [...] > > > remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_mss: Use a carveout to authenticate modem > > headers > > With this change now merged, am I ok to downgrade the arm64 > arch_dma_prep_coherent() back to a clean? > I think you can. If something breaks, we will fix it (without reverting) ;) - Mani > Thanks, > > Will -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists