[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230403160735.1211468-1-robdclark@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 09:07:35 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH] drm/vblank: Simplify drm_dev_has_vblank()
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
What does vblank have to do with num_crtcs? Well, this was technically
correct, but you'd have to go look at where num_crtcs is initialized to
understand why. Lets just replace it with the simpler and more obvious
check.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
index 877e2067534f..ad34c235d853 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vblank_init);
*/
bool drm_dev_has_vblank(const struct drm_device *dev)
{
- return dev->num_crtcs != 0;
+ return !!dev->vblank;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_has_vblank);
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists