[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8050df0c-753b-1733-962f-b4065500a090@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 21:35:04 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dylan Van Assche <me@...anvanassche.be>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Amol Maheshwari <amahesh@....qualcomm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: misc: qcom,fastrpc: allow FastRPC
node without reg entry
On 27/03/2023 20:48, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
> FastRPC nodes may exist without a registry property and actual
Why would they exist without unit address?
> Compute Banks in some cases such as the SLPI on the Qualcomm SDM845 SoC.
I do not see there anything disallowing unit address yet...
> Relax the regex to allow such FastRPC nodes and remove 'reg' as a
> required property.
No, at least not without proper explanation why unit address is not
allowed for these.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists