[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1d389343-9a7e-67e3-6948-8604e33da754@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 21:36:04 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Dylan Van Assche <me@...anvanassche.be>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Amol Maheshwari <amahesh@....qualcomm.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] dts: arm64: qcom: sdm845: add SLPI FastRPC support
On 27/03/2023 20:48, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
> Qualcomm SDM845 SoC features a SLPI DSP which uses FastRPC through
> an allocated memory region to load files from the host filesystem
> such as sensor configuration files.
>
> Add a FastRPC node at /dev/fastrpc-sdsp and a DMA region, similar to
> downstream, to allow userspace to communicate with the SLPI via the
> FastRPC interface for initializing the sensors on the SLPI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dylan Van Assche <me@...anvanassche.be>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index 3b547cb7aeb8..7412ea938765 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -878,6 +878,14 @@ mdata_mem: mpss-metadata {
> size = <0 0x4000>;
> no-map;
> };
> +
> + fastrpc_mem: fastrpc {
> + compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
> + reusable;
> + alloc-ranges = <0 0x00000000 0 0xffffffff>;
> + alignment = <0 0x400000>;
> + size = <0 0x1000000>;
> + };
> };
>
> adsp_pas: remoteproc-adsp {
> @@ -3344,6 +3352,21 @@ glink-edge {
> label = "dsps";
> qcom,remote-pid = <3>;
> mboxes = <&apss_shared 24>;
> +
> + fastrpc {
> + compatible = "qcom,fastrpc";
> + qcom,glink-channels = "fastrpcglink-apps-dsp";
> + label = "sdsp";
> + qcom,non-secure-domain;
> + qcom,vmids = <0x3 0xF 0x5 0x6>;
> + memory-region = <&fastrpc_mem>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
This does not make sense now with children nodes not having unit
addresses... but anyway, I do not understand why this one compute node
cannot have unit address.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists