linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] Monthly io-uring report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANp29Y42=xHjyW5ZUDp8f3gaWV=_FVTb0SgtpECyX9yc8wxbbw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Mar 2023 22:12:22 +0200
From:   Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+lista29bb0eabb2ddbae6f4a@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] Monthly io-uring report

On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 9:20 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> > By the way, should F: fs/io-wq.c also be added to the IO_URING's
> > record in the MAINTAINERS file?
>
> I think you're looking at a really old tree, none of the supported
> stable trees even have any io_uring code in fs/ anymore. Maybe they need
> a MAINTAINERS update though? But even 5.10-stable has io-wq included,
> though it's pointing at the wrong path now...

Ah, sorry, I was indeed looking at an old crash report.

>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>