linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] virtio/vsock: fix leak due to missing skb owner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZBWivg3d7G/ETqqo@bullseye>
Date:   Sat, 18 Mar 2023 11:38:38 +0000
From:   Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc:     Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio/vsock: fix leak due to missing skb owner

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 09:58:00AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 10:01:05PM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > This patch sets the owner for the skb when being sent from a socket and
> > so solves the leak caused when virtio_transport_purge_skbs() finds
> > skb->sk is always NULL and therefore never matches it with the current
> > socket. Setting the owner upon allocation fixes this.
> > 
> > Fixes: 71dc9ec9ac7d ("virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff")
> > Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
> > Reported-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZCCbATwov4U+GBUv@pop-os.localdomain/
> > ---
> > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index 957cdc01c8e8..2a2f0c1a9fbd 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
> > 					 info->op,
> > 					 info->flags);
> > 
> > +	if (info->vsk)
> > +		skb_set_owner_w(skb, sk_vsock(info->vsk));
> > +
> 
> Should we do the same also in virtio_transport_recv_pkt()?
> 
> The skb in that cases is allocated in drivers/vhost/vsock.c and
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c using directly
> virtio_vsock_alloc_skb(), because we don't know in advance which socket
> it belongs to.
> 
> Then in virtio_transport_recv_pkt() we look for the socket and queue it
> up. This should also solve the problem in vsock_loopback.c where we move
> skb from one socket to another.
> 

That's a great point, skb_set_owner_r() in recv_pkt() will do all of the
right accounting when called by vsock_loopback_work.

I'll add that in a v2.

Thanks,
Bobby