[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5865a840-cb5e-ead1-f168-100869081f84@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 18:17:11 +0200
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
CC: <martin@...ibond.com>, <axboe@...nel.dk>, <minchan@...nel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <hubcap@...ibond.com>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
<brauner@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <gost.dev@...sung.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <devel@...ts.orangefs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] zram: remove the call to page_endio in the bio
end_io handler
On 2023-03-28 17:19, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 01:27:12PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
>> -static void zram_page_end_io(struct bio *bio)
>> +static void zram_read_end_io(struct bio *bio)
>> {
>> - struct page *page = bio_first_page_all(bio);
>> -
>> - page_endio(page, op_is_write(bio_op(bio)),
>> - blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status));
>> bio_put(bio);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -635,7 +631,7 @@ static int read_from_bdev_async(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec,
>> }
>>
>> if (!parent)
>> - bio->bi_end_io = zram_page_end_io;
>> + bio->bi_end_io = zram_read_end_io;
>
> Can we just do:
>
> if (!parent)
> bio->bi_end_io = bio_put;
>
Looks neat. I will wait for Christoph to comment whether just a bio_put() call
is enough in this case for non-chained bios before making this change for the
next version.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists