[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <026912e3-4479-415e-96db-abbb2f533599@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:55:17 -0700
From: Chris Lew <quic_clew@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rpmsg: glink: Propagate TX failures in intentless
mode as well
On 3/27/2023 7:41 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> As support for splitting transmision over several messages using
> TX_DATA_CONT was introduced it does not immediately return the return
> value of qcom_glink_tx().
>
> The result is that in the intentless case (i.e. intent == NULL), the
> code will continue to send all additional chunks. This is wasteful, and
> it's possible that the send operation could incorrectly indicate
> success, if the last chunk fits in the TX fifo.
>
> Fix the condition.
>
> Fixes: 8956927faed3 ("rpmsg: glink: Add TX_DATA_CONT command while sending")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
> ---
s/transmision/transmission
Reviewed-by: Chris Lew <quic_clew@...cinc.com>
> drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> index 01d2805fe30f..62634d020d13 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> @@ -1356,8 +1356,9 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
> ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data, chunk_size, wait);
>
> /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> - if (ret && intent) {
> - intent->in_use = false;
> + if (ret) {
> + if (intent)
> + intent->in_use = false;
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1378,8 +1379,9 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
> chunk_size, wait);
>
> /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> - if (ret && intent) {
> - intent->in_use = false;
> + if (ret) {
> + if (intent)
> + intent->in_use = false;
> break;
> }
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists