[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e01c0579-5ce2-459b-0306-7351f8aca561@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 15:10:45 -0700
From: Chris Lew <quic_clew@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rpmsg: glink: Consolidate TX_DATA and TX_DATA_CONT
On 3/27/2023 7:41 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Rather than duplicating most of the code for constructing the initial
> TX_DATA and subsequent TX_DATA_CONT packets, roll them into a single
> loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 46 +++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> index 62634d020d13..082cf7f4888e 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> @@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
> int ret;
> unsigned long flags;
> int chunk_size = len;
> - int left_size = 0;
> + size_t offset = 0;
>
> if (!glink->intentless) {
> while (!intent) {
> @@ -1343,49 +1343,29 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
> iid = intent->id;
> }
>
> - if (wait && chunk_size > SZ_8K) {
> - chunk_size = SZ_8K;
> - left_size = len - chunk_size;
> - }
> - req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA);
> - req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
> - req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
> - req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
> - req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
> -
> - ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data, chunk_size, wait);
> -
> - /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> - if (ret) {
> - if (intent)
> - intent->in_use = false;
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - while (left_size > 0) {
> - data = (void *)((char *)data + chunk_size);
> - chunk_size = left_size;
> - if (chunk_size > SZ_8K)
> + while (offset < len) {
> + chunk_size = len - offset;
> + if (chunk_size > SZ_8K && (wait || offset > 0))
offset > 0 seems to be a new condition compared to the previous logic.
Are we adding this as a cached check because we know if offset is set
then fragmented sends are allowed?
I don't think wait would have changed during the loop, so I'm not sure
if offset > 0 is adding any extra value to the check.
> chunk_size = SZ_8K;
> - left_size -= chunk_size;
>
> - req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
> + req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(offset == 0 ? GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA : GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
> req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
> req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
> req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
> - req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
> + req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(len - offset - chunk_size);
>
> - ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data,
> - chunk_size, wait);
> -
> - /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> + ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data + offset, chunk_size, wait);
> if (ret) {
> + /* Mark intent available if we failed */
> if (intent)
> intent->in_use = false;
> - break;
> + return ret;
> }
> +
> + offset += chunk_size;
> }
> - return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int qcom_glink_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists