linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v6 5/5] mfd: max77541: Add ADI MAX77541/MAX77540 PMIC Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MN2PR03MB5168249900206433A082875EE7889@MN2PR03MB5168.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 08:26:41 +0000
From:   "Sahin, Okan" <Okan.Sahin@...log.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        "Bolboaca, Ramona" <Ramona.Bolboaca@...log.com>,
        ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        "Tilki, Ibrahim" <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
        William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
        Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 5/5]  mfd: max77541: Add ADI MAX77541/MAX77540 PMIC
 Support

>On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 07 Mar 2023, Okan Sahin wrote:
>>
>> > MFD driver for MAX77541/MAX77540 to enable its sub devices.
>> >
>> > The MAX77541 is a multi-function devices. It includes buck converter
>> > and ADC.
>> >
>> > The MAX77540 is a high-efficiency buck converter with two 3A
>> > switching phases.
>> >
>> > They have same regmap except for ADC part of MAX77541.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Okan Sahin <okan.sahin@...log.com>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/mfd/Kconfig          |  13 ++
>> >  drivers/mfd/Makefile         |   1 +
>> >  drivers/mfd/max77541.c       | 224
>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >  include/linux/mfd/max77541.h |  97 +++++++++++++++
>> >  4 files changed, 335 insertions(+)
>> >  create mode 100644 drivers/mfd/max77541.c  create mode 100644
>> > include/linux/mfd/max77541.h
>>
>> FYI: I'm not re-reviewing this since you've chosen to ignore some of
>> my previous review comments.  Issues highlighted by review comments
>> don't just go away on resubmission.
>
>... and the subject is malformed.
>
>--
>Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Hi Lee,

I am sorry if I missed your review comments, this was not my intention. I want to thank you for your contribution. Your feedbacks are very valuable, and I am trying to understand and fix each one before sending the patch. Indeed, I sorted your feedback on previous patches. As far as I know, I have fixed all of them, is there a problem with any of them that I fixed, or is there any missing review? From you, there were some comments like "why did you use this?", I suppose I need to respond them before sending following patches. I thought I should not bother the maintainers unnecessarily. I am sorry for them.
	
For previous patch(v5), There was feedback from Andy. I did not fix them. 

1) 
> They have same regmap except for ADC part of MAX77541.

Extra space in the Subject.

...

> +#include <linux/of_device.h

This is my fault, I missed this comment. I will fix in following patch(v7).

2)
...

> +static const struct regmap_config max77541_regmap_config = {
> +	.reg_bits   = 8,
> +	.val_bits   = 8,

Do you need lock of regmap?

> +};

...

Since I do not need lock of regmap, I did not change anything in regmap_config (v6). Do I need to answer this question even if I don't need lock of regmap?

For the other reviews, I fixed them as you said. Thank you for your time, and effort. Sorry for the misunderstanding and confusion.

Regards,
Okan