lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Mar 2023 15:51:52 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Sahin, Okan" <Okan.Sahin@...log.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Cosmin Tanislav <demonsingur@...il.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>,
        Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        "Bolboaca, Ramona" <Ramona.Bolboaca@...log.com>,
        ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
        "Tilki, Ibrahim" <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
        William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@...aro.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
        Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5]  mfd: max77541: Add ADI MAX77541/MAX77540 PMIC
 Support

On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 08:26:41AM +0000, Sahin, Okan wrote:
> >On Wed, 15 Mar 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, 07 Mar 2023, Okan Sahin wrote:

...

> For previous patch(v5), There was feedback from Andy. I did not fix them. 

Why not? :-)

> 1) 
> > They have same regmap except for ADC part of MAX77541.
> 
> Extra space in the Subject.
> 
> ...
> 
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h
> 
> This is my fault, I missed this comment. I will fix in following patch(v7).
> 
> 2)
> ...
> 
> > +static const struct regmap_config max77541_regmap_config = {
> > +	.reg_bits   = 8,
> > +	.val_bits   = 8,
> 
> Do you need lock of regmap?
> 
> > +};
> 
> ...
> 
> Since I do not need lock of regmap, I did not change anything in
> regmap_config (v6). Do I need to answer this question even if I don't need
> lock of regmap?

IIRC the lock is opt-out. You need to explicitly disable it if not needed.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ