[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZCTOxOGDPoJoZDNW@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 08:50:28 +0900
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Desnes Nunes <desnesn@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
noreply@...erman.id.au, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] dma-debug: Use %pa to format phys_addr_t
I've applied this as it is the first fix I got into my mailbox for it.
Arnd sent one a little later, which uses %pap instead of %pa, which
confused me a bit. The documentation seems to allow both without
any recommendation which one to use, which confuses me even further.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists