[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1b99542d-f21b-a27b-fc59-d4fe38e893de@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:06:09 +0800
From: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-cachefs@...hat.com, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>, zhujia.zj@...edance.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V4 2/5] cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from
cachefiles_object
在 2023/3/28 21:58, David Howells 写道:
> Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com> wrote:
>
>> @@ -65,10 +71,7 @@ struct cachefiles_object {
>> enum cachefiles_content content_info:8; /* Info about content presence */
>> unsigned long flags;
>> #define CACHEFILES_OBJECT_USING_TMPFILE 0 /* Have an unlinked tmpfile */
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_CACHEFILES_ONDEMAND
>> - int ondemand_id;
>> - enum cachefiles_object_state state;
>> -#endif
>> + struct cachefiles_ondemand_info *private;
>
> Why is this no longer inside "#ifdef CONFIG_CACHEFILES_ONDEMAND"?
>
I'll revise it in next version.
> Also, please don't call it "private", but rather something like "ondemand" or
> "ondemand_info".
I'll use @ondemand to replace it.
Thanks.
>
> David
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists