[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e2d77df-da40-0a06-0401-e15af96fe811@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 08:07:42 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf tools: Address fixes
On 16/03/23 21:41, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here are 3 small fixes resulting from a report from a
> kernel test robot:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202303061424.6ad43294-yujie.liu@intel.com
>
> Issues were revealed due to the use of build
> option:
>
> EXTRA_CFLAGS="-fsanitize=undefined -fsanitize=address"
>
>
> Adrian Hunter (3):
> perf symbols: Fix use-after-free in get_plt_got_name()
> perf symbols: Fix unaligned access in get_x86_64_plt_disp()
> perf tools: Avoid warning in do_realloc_array_as_needed()
>
> tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 10 ++++++++--
> tools/perf/util/util.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
These seem to be still outstanding.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists