linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: mv_xor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <16cfc681-7a08-4160-bd69-4c8b59774688@kili.mountain>
Date:   Wed, 29 Mar 2023 13:27:27 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: mv_xor_v2: Fix an error code.

On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 09:06:37AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If the probe is deferred, -EPROBE_DEFER should be returned, not
> +EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> Fixes: 3cd2c313f1d6 ("dmaengine: mv_xor_v2: Fix clock resource by adding a register clock")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c b/drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c
> index 89790beba305..0991b8265829 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/mv_xor_v2.c
> @@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ static int mv_xor_v2_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	xor_dev->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>  	if (PTR_ERR(xor_dev->clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> -		ret = EPROBE_DEFER;
> +		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  		goto disable_reg_clk;

Heh.  Looking through the Smatch results, I don't think this actually
affects runtime because driver_probe_device() checks for both positive
and negatives.  People shouldn't be returning positives, of course, but
it appears there is a work around for bugs built in already.

regards,
dan carpenter