[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230329085106.046a8991@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 08:51:06 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>
Cc: mhiramat@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping
functions
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 07:03:53 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> struct ring_buffer_meta_page_header {
> #if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> __u64 entries;
> __u64 overrun;
> #else
> __u32 entries;
> __u32 overrun;
> #endif
> __u32 pages_touched;
> __u32 meta_page_size;
> __u32 reader_page; /* page ID for the reader page */
> __u32 nr_data_pages; /* doesn't take into account the reader_page */
> };
Oh, I guess we should also expose the amount read on the reader page,
that gets updated on the ioctl. That is, if the first time we read the
reader page and the page is not full and unmap the pages, and then new
events were added to the reader page, we should not re-read the events
that were read previously.
That is, expose cpu_buffer->reader_page->read
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists